Obama's EU Tour Still Under Investigation





President Obama's recent European Tour (12 cities, each one sold out, rocked them all) has been criticized for every shake, step, or courtesy in or out of place. Amid photos of bows/bends and molestation of queens, it was this quiet photo that stood apart. Of all the so-called breaches of protocol, this one spoke volumes. A black royal cop and President Obama shook hands in passing, as he entered the halls of British royalty. The significance lies in the demonstration of brotherhood. Without preamble, they recognized and acknowledged the perspective and hope virtually universal among people of color. That officer may have never given a second thought to his color in relation to his position, but when a black man came through those gates as President of the United States, he recognized the level of authority being held that was previously unavailable to any black.

Around the world, people of color in any position of authority will look towards a level above and eventually see a white line. Every black corporal has their white Sergeant, black principal has their white superintendent, black secretary of state to their white president. Throughout the history of racial slavery, white supremacy and bigotry have had their institutions breached as humanity evolves, slowly but surely. By shaking his hand, Obama recognized that cop had stood at that post day after day as another black worker in a white institution until he, as the first black president, broke the color line. When Jackie Robinson made it into the Major League, there was pride among blacks as if "we can play professional baseball now." As they shook hands, they were seeing it- a black man can reach the highest elected post. Despite the social stigma associated with celebrating President Obama's race, it happens. The sooner people accept the taciturn brotherhood affiliated with race, the sooner we can expand it to a human sense of brotherhood. Kudos to these to men, for bucking expectations and relating to one another.

N-words vs F-words




Black people are homophobic.
Of all the issues I have vastly more controversial views on, being pro gay marriage is the one I find most polarizing among my dark-skinned peers. They accept my religious ambiguity, my liberalism, and my unconventional and unclassifiable political views, but mention homosexuality and there is no room for compromise. Either you are anti gay marriage, or you are gay. Chew on this darkies: just as being called "black" doesn't insult, neither will "gay", for only in the eyes of the insulter are the terms negative.
If you oppose gay marriage, listen to my case. I personally am a fan of a well proportioned woman's behind- with a little extra as bonus (gluteous maximus). Believe it or not, there are people who actually prefer what is called in layman's terms a pancake butt (gluteous flatimous). Just as the preference to pancake butt over the traditional onion booty is mind boggling, I do not understand the attraction to men (for men OR women). However, if you want to marry a pancake butt, it is a matter of personal preference and the law should not intervene based on my beliefs.
I cannot support legal action against a group just because of the Christian/morality argument. Even the most fervent of Christians should ask if US law should be based on Christian law. If so, then why even allow Muslims or anyone else inside the country? Why refer to the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution instead of The Ten Commandments and Deuteronomy? If you oppose gay marriage, does that mean you support homosexual promiscuity? Banning gay marriage won't curb homosexuality, it just deters men from doing what they already struggle with- settling down.
The root of this argument in the black community is still based on gay vs straight. Gay marriage as an issue should not be decided upon who's gay vs who's straight, but that's the de facto division.
The question isn't do you support homosexuality or not, but should gay people be allowed to marry? Why not? "Because they are going to hell" may be a valid argument in the courts of heaven, but good luck with that legal argument in the courts of earth. If you oppose gay marriage because you oppose gay activity, should the law oppose interracial and all black marriage, as it has shown a legal distaste for people of color in general?